Hedroom 中的其他功能

每個 App 的能耗

免費

哪些 App 在用電,以瓦為單位,實測數字與估算值分開顯示。

Ships in 1.2. The roadmap shows what is built and what is still unchecked on real Macs.

The problem

Your battery drains faster than it should, and Activity Monitor's Energy Impact is a relative score, not a unit. It does not tell you how many watts an app draws, or what the chip as a whole is using.

The Energy view shows watts: per app where macOS keeps a counter, and for the chip split into CPU, GPU, Neural Engine and memory where your Mac reports them. Where a number is an estimate, it says so, and an estimate never reaches a receipt.

How it works

  1. Read the counter. macOS keeps a running energy total for each process. Hedroom takes the difference over each scan window and adds up an app and its helpers, which gives watts.
  2. Mark estimates. If macOS gives no counter for an app, Hedroom shares the chip's CPU power by CPU time and shows it with "≈" and the word "estimate". An app macOS does not let Hedroom read shows no number, never 0.
  3. Read the chip. Chip power comes from a macOS interface Apple does not document, so Hedroom checks it works on your Mac and says so when it does not.
  4. Keep the battery separate. The "time left" figure uses the battery's own voltage and current, because chip power leaves out the display, the SSD and the radios.
  5. Use only measured values in receipts. Estimates are never stored. A receipt uses an app's own watts only when it has at least 3 measured readings before the action, and counts a change only from 0.3 W.

What you will see

On the CPU & Energy screen, the Energy tile shows battery percentage and the measured chip watts with their split. On battery it also shows what the whole Mac draws from the battery. Under "Top energy users", up to five apps are listed with watts: "1.4 W" when measured, or "≈ 1.4 W · estimate" when not. The list stays hidden until at least one app uses 0.05 W or more.

If macOS stops reporting chip power, for example after an update changes how it is reported, a card says "Energy readings paused". Memory, CPU, rules and storage keep working.

A worked example

Example, not real data

Two apps, two kinds of number

Say the top energy users list shows one app at "1.4 W" and another at "≈ 1.1 W · estimate". The first number is read from macOS's own counter for that app. The second is the chip's CPU power divided by CPU time, because macOS gave no counter for it. Idle power lands on whoever ran, so treat it as a guide.

You move the first app to the efficiency cores. Hedroom's receipt uses its measured watts and reports the change if it clears 0.3 W. For the second app, a receipt would fall back to another measure instead of building on an estimate.

Details and limits

它做什麼

  • 從 macOS 為每個處理程序保留的能耗計數器中讀取每個 App 的瓦數。
  • 當 macOS 沒有給出某個 App 的計數器時,顯示一個估算值(把晶片的 CPU 耗電量按 CPU 時間分攤),並標上「≈」和「估算」。
  • 在「能耗」磁貼上顯示晶片耗電量,在 Mac 報告的地方,按 CPU、GPU、神經網路引擎和記憶體分開。

What it will not do

  • 把估算值當作測量值呈現,或把估算值存起來。回執只使用實測的每個 App 的瓦數。
  • 把晶片瓦數當作電池消耗。「剩餘時間」的數字使用的是電池自身的電壓和電流。

Limits

  • 並不是每台 Mac 都會報告每一路耗電量通道。Hedroom 顯示它能讀到的,其餘的不顯示。

免費還是 Pro

可免費查看。

Seeing where your power goes changes nothing. Moving an app to the efficiency cores is a fix, so that is Pro.

7 天試用包含 Pro 的全部內容。完整價格表。

Questions people ask

Is this Activity Monitor's Energy Impact?

No. Hedroom shows watts, and never an Energy Impact score.

How much battery does reading energy use?

One read of the chip's energy counters took about 1 millisecond on the MacBook Pro it was checked on, and Hedroom reads at most once every 3.5 seconds. That is one Mac, not a promise for yours.

Why does "time left" not match the chip watts?

Chip power leaves out the display, the SSD and the radios, so pairing it with time left would overstate battery life. Time left uses the battery's own voltage and current.

Does it need a permission?

No admin password and no special permission. Per-app readings are available for processes your user account can read.

看看是什麼在拖慢你的 Mac。

監測是免費的,無需信用卡,也無需帳號。 Pro 提供 7 天免費試用,隨第一個經過簽名的版本開放。如果它無法向你展示可測量的差別,就不要留著它。